On the first Friday of
every month, Novelista Annie Burrows has been sharing a very personal view of
what it is like to be a writer. And is dealing with themes in
alphabetical order. This month, she's reached P...
While I was trying to get my
first book published, I read a very helpful "how to" book called
"The 1st 5 pages", by Noah Lukeman, which contained a piece of
writing advice that stunned me. It
suggested that before I even started my story, I ought to decide from whose
viewpoint I was going to tell it, and whether to do so in 1st, 2nd, or 3rd
person.
Er...what?
What is a viewpoint
character, I wondered, and what is the difference between first, second or
third person narration?
In a nutshell, in case you
didn't know either, the viewpoint character is the person through whose eyes a
reader will experience the story. The
person whose story it is. If it is
written in 1st person, it will be "I" did this that or the other. I'm currently reading a fabulous thriller by
Dick Francis, who always seems to tell his story in the first person, and comes
up with some amazing opening lines because of it. Because he uses the first person, you always
feel as if you are experiencing the story alongside someone who has only just
gone through it themselves, and is telling you all about it.
2nd person is "you"
did it. Apparently this is the hardest
of all to write and is rarely used. I
can't think of a single example to give you - sorry! 3rd person is "she/he" did this that
or the other, and is the most commonly used.
I knew that writing a story
is a kind of world-building exercise.
I'd always thought of it as painting a picture with words. But this chapter likened it to playing a
piece of music, in which any inconsistency with the viewpoint would sound like
a clashing, crashing discord, shattering the harmony.
So I read the single chapter
dealing with viewpoint very carefully, and then looked at my own current
manuscript, as recommended. Firstly, I
discovered that I had been writing from my heroine's viewpoint (mostly) in 3rd
person all along. Which, coincidentally,
turned out to be what Mills & Boon recommended in their guidelinesat the time. And since Mills & Boon
was the publisher I was targeting, it was a jolly good job too.
I also learnt about the
various ways I could make mistakes with handling viewpoint. I could change from the viewpoint of one
character to another with bewildering rapidity, I could tell sections of the
story from the viewpoint of characters who really didn't matter, and shouldn't
have come to the fore, or I could fumble it altogether by having a character
say or think something she couldn't possibly have known.
I'd thought my writing was
pretty good, before then, but after reading the chapter on viewpoint, that
story suddenly seemed full of discordant notes.
I had indeed switched viewpoint so quickly any reader would have had
trouble keeping up with who was the main player in a scene. I had also written substantial chunks from
the point of view of characters who shouldn't have been speaking directly to my
reader.
Those errors wouldn't have
been errors at all if I was writing the kind of story where it is fine to have
several people giving their account of the story. In crime novels, for example, one incident
can be related by several witnesses.
I've also read family sagas
where the thread gets taken
up by someone from the next generation. So
long as the change from one character's viewpoint to another is made clear and doesn't
confuse the reader, that method can suit certain types of story.
However, since I'm writing
romance, and I want to create an intense emotional experience for my reader, it
is far better to get right inside my heroine's head, and stay there (unless I
need to let people know what the hero is thinking). When the reader knows what my heroine knows,
understand what motivates her to act the way she does, it creates empathy. Even if the heroine acts badly, the readers
should know why she did what she did, and will therefore still keep rooting for
her. Same goes for the hero.
But if I introduce scenes
from anyone else's point of view, and take the focus off the main characters,
it dilutes the intense emotion I want my reader to feel. There was no need for the woman my heroine
(Amity) met in the dressmaker to suddenly start talking to the reader. It was Amity's story, not Mrs Kirkham's. Similarly, I shouldn't have written anything
from Amity's brother's point of view, particularly since he was going to die in
chapter 4.
Nor should I have had Amity
knowing exactly what her brother was thinking, no matter how close they'd been
as children, except by reading his body language and taking her best guess.
In fact the only viewpoint
mistake I hadn't made was switching from first (which I'd never used) to second
or third.
So, once I'd learned about
the various types of viewpoint, I then began to think a bit harder about whose
viewpoint to use in any scene. To create
the most impact for the reader, it's best to think about which character will
have the most invested at the time. Who
has the most to lose or gain? Since I
write romance, I really only have the choice between the hero or the heroine,
but it is a point that still needs careful consideration. Do I focus on the heroine's determination to
resist the hero, whose rakish reputation has already made her turn down his
proposal of marriage more than once, in spite of the almost overwhelming
attraction she feels for him? Or do I
get inside the hero's head, and let the reader know that this time, he has
really fallen in love, and his devil-may-care smile hides his fear of
rejection?
Once I'd got the hang of
considering point of view, it made a huge difference to my writing. Once I stopped digressing into the mind of
the heroine's brother, his commanding officer, a woman Amity met in the
dressmaker, or anyone else, the story focussed more closely on my heroine, and
her journey of discovery, and therefore became more interesting.
Amity still hasn't found a
publisher - but I'm working on it!
Annie's latest book is "A Mistress for Major Bartlett", 2nd in the "Brides of Waterloo" series from Harlequin. Currently available from Amazon
No comments:
Post a Comment
We love to hear from you, so don't be shy . . .